What ever happened to simple numeric suffixes to titles like Jaws 2 or Friday the 13th Part 4: The Dream Master? In the past decade, films have gotten more ridiculous with titles of sequels like Step Up 2 The Streets or Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian. Now, Darren Aronofsky’s sequel to 2009’s X-Men Origins: Wolverine is taking another route by going by the name The Wolverine.
In an interview with HitFix, Aronofsky explained that his film isn’t a traditional sequel.
The film that he’s directing is officially called “The Wolverine,” and there won’t be a number attached to it. In our interview, he referred to the movie as a “one-off,” and he emphasized that the film isn’t a sequel in any conventional sense.
In 2009, Origins was said to be the beginning of a film series based around the backstories of specific characters. For a while, Fox was toying with the idea of doing an X-Men Origins: Magneto with Ian McKellan attached. That idea was more than likely put on the shelf due to a certain Hobbit.
We already know that Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine is heading to Japan in the upcoming film, in which we expect to see run ins with the Yakuza-like gang The Hand and possibly even the classic villain Silver Samurai.
The Wolverine begins shooting in March for a possible release in the summer of 2012.
Susan
November 16, 2010 at 3:29 pmAt least this time it seems like they aren’t even trying to hide how crappy the movie is going to be. +1 for honesty I guess.
Tweets that mention ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ Sequel To Simply Be Called ‘The Wolverine’ | The Flickcast -- Topsy.com
November 15, 2010 at 11:27 pm[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by The Flickcast, Einstein. Einstein said: 'X-Men Origins: Wolverine' Sequel To Simply Be Called 'The Wolverine' http://bit.ly/bjvdyg […]
[A]
November 16, 2010 at 12:00 amSo.. so there’s.. so there’s hope..?